<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Screening for 2nd primaries</title>
		<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-362022/screening-for-2nd-primaries</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Screening for 2nd primaries&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 23:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-362022#post-1155835</guid>
				<title>Screening for 2nd primaries</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-362022/screening-for-2nd-primaries#post-1155835</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 06:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Jyotirup Goswami</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>435573</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Just a thought that's been bugging me lately&#8212;where does the idea of routine serial triple-scopy in follow-up of head and neck cancers stand? Would it help to diagnose 2nd primaries in a more effective way? What does the literature say?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>