<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Portal Dosimetry and Gamma Histograms</title>
		<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-304875/portal-dosimetry-and-gamma-histograms</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Portal Dosimetry and Gamma Histograms&quot; - Using Portal dosimetry and Gamma Histograms for Plan Evaluation</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 14:50:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-304875#post-992969</guid>
				<title>Portal Dosimetry and Gamma Histograms</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-304875/portal-dosimetry-and-gamma-histograms#post-992969</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Ayan Basu</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>417597</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Would be interested to know how many / which centers are using portal dosimetry for radiotherapy plan evaluation :</p> <p>1.Do you use Gamma Histograms to evaluate calculated dose distributions against measured ( Portal Dosimetry)?<br /> 2.Do you use Gamma Histograms to validate your planning systems ?<br /> 3.Is it acceptable to use an acceptance criteria of 3% Dose Difference &amp; 3mm Distance To Agreement (DTA) for all sites?<br /> 4.Is it a valid concern that commercially available planning systems bundling different algorithms for Treatment Planning &amp; Dose Calculation and a Monte Carlo for inter-comparison using Gamma Histograms OR Portal Dosimetry licenses for inter-comparison using Gamma Histograms might give a false sense of security during IMRT QA since they are on the same platform and from the same vendor?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>