<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Journal Club 2</title>
		<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-302579/journal-club-2</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Journal Club 2&quot; - Should we re-examine the role of RT in early stage Seminoma Testis patients?</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 14:01:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-302579#post-984428</guid>
				<title>JC 2</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-302579/journal-club-2#post-984428</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Santam Chakraborty </wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>416676</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>A new population based cohort study reveals changing pattern of practice w.r.t testicular seminoma in the Scandinavian nations. Published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology this article is sure to get lots of attention. However the assertion made by the authors regarding the role of RT in this indication merits greater examination.<br /> So the 2nd journal club is now live at <a href="http://www.isocentre.org/gu:is-rt-required-in-csi-testicular-seminoma">http://www.isocentre.org/gu:is-rt-required-in-csi-testicular-seminoma</a><br /> Please use the comments box below the page to comment. No comments will be allowed here.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>