Referring to Trial results http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-222558/referring-to-trial-results Posts in the discussion thread "Referring to Trial results" - perhaps when trial results are referred to there should be a link to PubMed, or a summary of the reference on the Articles page with an upload of the PDF if it is felt to be a significant article Fri, 10 Jul 2026 17:32:25 +0000 http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-222558#post-710375 Re: Referring to Trial results http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-222558/referring-to-trial-results#post-710375 Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:07:51 +0000 AAM 61952 Srinivas, this isn't the proper place to put them in here. They should go under the H&N Articles section, and then post a link back to them in your original post.

]]> http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-222558#post-709884 Re: Referring to Trial results http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-222558/referring-to-trial-results#post-709884 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:55:50 +0000 Srinivas Chilukuri 421704 1. Bourhis et al. Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis Lancet 2006; 368: 843–54.

2. C Srinivas et al. Altered fractionated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Lancet 2006 ;368:1867.

3. Olmi et al. LOCOREGIONALLY ADVANCED CARCINOMA OF THE OROPHARYNX: CONVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY VS. ACCELERATED HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY VS. CONCOMITANT RADIOTHERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY—A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED TRIAL. Int. J. ROBP;55, No. 1, pp. 78–92, 2003.

Sorry for not putting references. I could not found option for attachment.

]]> http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-222558#post-709492 Referring to Trial results http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-222558/referring-to-trial-results#post-709492 Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:18:15 +0000 AAM 61952 I was just reading a post that mentioned the "ORO trial". Unfortunately that type of reference leaves me none the wiser. There is a link from some of the disease sites to an article list (e.g., H&N, GU). Is it possible for the article reference to be placed here, and possibly the file (PDF) uploaded as has occurred on the H&N site.

Also might it be useful to have the original proposer of an email discussion to write a short synopsis of the case/problem, references and opinions to post of the relevant disease sub-site?

]]>