<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Clinical and Biological Evidence (new threads)</title>
		<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/c-101777/clinical-and-biological-evidence</link>
		<description>Threads in the forum category &quot;Clinical and Biological Evidence&quot; - Issues related to current clinical and biological evidence (not case based).</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 12:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-300448</guid>
				<title>Number of isocentres for SRS</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-300448/number-of-isocentres-for-srs</link>
				<description>What is the minimum number of isocentres required for SRS</description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>radtuxabhishek</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>495857</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>In Gamma Knife multiple isocentres are placed (ahem!) to create dose heterogeneity.</p> <p>Is it justified to keep a single isocentre for say spherical target? Or multiple isocentres for the same? Or any other recommendation?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-299394</guid>
				<title>Should we aim for homogeneity in IMRT plans?</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-299394/should-we-aim-for-homogeneity-in-imrt-plans</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>radtuxabhishek</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>495857</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>One simple question that has been bothering me. Why should we aim for homogeneity of dose within the tumor volume when inherently the tumor is inhomogeneous? Is it required for comparing the plans or an esoteric ideation? Can we do without it?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-298852</guid>
				<title>&#039;p&#039; value significance</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-298852/p-value-significance</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 04:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Ayan Basu</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>417597</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>interesting editorial in JNCI : <a href="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/103/1/2.full">http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/103/1/2.full</a></p> <p>members' comments</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-297443</guid>
				<title>Charlson Comorbidity Index</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-297443/charlson-comorbidity-index</link>
				<description>The first perpage discussion</description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Santam Chakraborty </wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>416676</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>In a new effort to provide interactivity to content creation we have enabled the per page discussion module which effectively allows us to comment on a created page.<br /> The first such page is available now at <a href="http://www.isocentre.org/data:charlson-s-comorbidity-index" target="_blank">the Charlson Comorbidity Index Score Page</a></p> <blockquote> <p>A short review of the Charlson Comorbidity Index has been created at here. Do check out the page and add your comments&#8230;.</p> </blockquote> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-261696</guid>
				<title>Making a strong case for Hyperthermia</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-261696/making-a-strong-case-for-hyperthermia</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>radtuxabhishek</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>495857</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Many a times I wonder, why shouldn't we use Hyperthermia given it's theoretical advantages as well as proven effect in many phase II/III trials. Just because it is cumbersome? Or that we need more research in this? What is the opinion (divided or consensus) opinion of the forum?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-260320</guid>
				<title>Risk of Secondary Cancers</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-260320/risk-of-secondary-cancers</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>radtuxabhishek</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>495857</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I am interested to know:<br /> 1) What is the risk of secondary cancers, if any by delivery of IMRT. I am concerned about the &quot;low dose cloud&quot; including the leakages from the treatment head. Is there any robust data and/or estimates for the same?</p> <p>2) It has been seen that majority of secondary cancers for patients treated for Carcinoma Cervix have been in bladder. Does that mean that when we perform brachytherapy and inadvertently the dose is &quot;high&quot; to any specific point on bladder, it would add on to risk of secondary cancer? This is more important because chronic atrophic changes in bladder mucosa is associated with a higher risk of turning into cancer.</p> <p>3) What is the importance of dose delivered during daily imaging for IGRT. How much &quot;extra dose&quot; over and above prescribed dose is delivered to patient? Is there any defined protocol to limit the dose? Does delivering higher MU to the patient give a better image quality (for MVCT machines).</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>