<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Head and Neck (new threads)</title>
		<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/c-101012/head-and-neck</link>
		<description>Threads in the forum category &quot;Head and Neck&quot; - Head and Neck case discussions</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 20:12:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-362022</guid>
				<title>Screening for 2nd primaries</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-362022/screening-for-2nd-primaries</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 06:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Jyotirup Goswami</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>435573</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Just a thought that's been bugging me lately&#8212;where does the idea of routine serial triple-scopy in follow-up of head and neck cancers stand? Would it help to diagnose 2nd primaries in a more effective way? What does the literature say?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-359760</guid>
				<title>Carcinoma LID</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-359760/carcinoma-lid</link>
				<description>role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in in-operable lid mallignancies</description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 03:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Dr Rahul Krishnatry</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>435674</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>a patient with lid malignancy - squamous or sebaceous or adenoid cystic; which is locally advanced with involvement of orbit, regional lymphnodes - what would be options for such patients.<br /> 1) NACT followed by surgical salvage +/- RT<br /> 2) salvage surgery followed by radiotherapy<br /> 3) palliative radiotherapy.<br /> if neoadjuvant chemotherapy is given; is there any difference in sensitivity of these histologies to chemo?<br /> any direct literature evidence? or just derived discussion from general head and neck cancers?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-358928</guid>
				<title>Verrucous carcinoma of the buccal mucosa</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-358928/verrucous-carcinoma-of-the-buccal-mucosa</link>
				<description>Should I offer RT for verroucous carcinoma of buccal mucosa</description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 14:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Santam Chakraborty </wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>416676</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>This problem is being posted here for Dr Nilesh Mahale.</p> <p>62/M<br /> 5*4&#160;cm Rt BM lesion involving lower alveolar mucosa. No palpacble LN<br /> Biopsy: Verrucous Ca<br /> CT not done yet<br /> Unfit for surgery due to cardiac morbidity.<br /> What are the treament options?<br /> Should we offer him radical RT as there is no other treatment option?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-356551</guid>
				<title>treatment of inoperable T4 buccal mucosa cancer</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-356551/treatment-of-inoperable-t4-buccal-mucosa-cancer</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 06:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Swarupa Mitra</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>428992</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi,<br /> i would like opinions regarding a case of buccal mucosa, T4N0 M0.<br /> Middle aged patient presents with a buccal mucosa tumour, invading RMT and the mandible, inoperable even after 3 cycles of NACT.<br /> What would now be the best course of action, considering a locally advanced tumour in a young patient with bone and skin involve ment.<br /> Such cases are very comon in all cance OPDS.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-351605</guid>
				<title>High grade poorly differentiated minor salivary gland tumor</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-351605/high-grade-poorly-differentiated-minor-salivary-gland-tumor</link>
				<description>Optimal treatment in High grade poorly differentiated minor salivary gland tumor</description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 05:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>PKTK</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>416844</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>34 years old married lady ( Young, GC- very good)<br /> Presented with swelling in left submandibular region and cheek x 1 yrs<br /> was taking some non specific treatment outside<br /> A biopsy from the lesion revealed High grade poorly differentiated minor salivary gland tumor.<br /> CT scan shows: primary and Conglomerate nodal mass in left submandibular region, Tx involving RMT, L Buccal mucosa and reaching superiorly upto ITF.<br /> Surgeon refused surgery i/v/o ITF involvement.<br /> Now referred for Chemo-RT</p> <p>What would be the optimal management<br /> 1. NACT &#8212;&gt; Assess for surgery &#8212;&gt; PORT<br /> 2. Radical Chemo Radiotherapy<br /> If 2. then which chemo? schedule&#8230; ( presently planned for 3 weekly cisplat conc with RT)<br /> RT.. Target, Dose, Is there in role of altered fractionation ( I am planning for IMRT to a dose of 66-70Gy)</p> <p>We don't have neutrons&#8230; so what can b done within available resourses</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-346493</guid>
				<title>Radiotherapy in pts with connective tissue disorders &amp; vitiligo</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-346493/radiotherapy-in-pts-with-connective-tissue-disorders-vitilig</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 08:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Dr Nilesh Mahale</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>436619</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>In our practice we encounter patients with connective tissue disorders &amp; vitiligo in whome radiation is indicated by virtue of malignancy stage.<br /> We all have read in text books that they tolerate RT poorly<br /> Given the oncological compulsions to irradiate them what are experiences of the member of this forum?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-344453</guid>
				<title>Childhood Naso-pharyngeal Carcinoma</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-344453/childhood-naso-pharyngeal-carcinoma</link>
				<description>Optimal Radiatuion dose?</description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>abhinavahluwalia</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>435805</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>What is the optimal radiation dose in Childhood Ca Nasopharynx and the role of neo adjuvant chemotherapy in this sub group.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-304722</guid>
				<title>Radiotherapy with a metallic plate.</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-304722/radiotherapy-with-a-metallic-plate</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Suruchi Singh</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>436621</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>55 yr old male, a case of post op Ca buccal mucosa. Just before starting RT pt had spontaneous # mandible while eating. The # was fixed with a metallic plate n pt is now due for RT with completely healed skin wound.<br /> What would be important points to be considered before RT planning?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-302182</guid>
				<title>Whole neck IMRT Vs Low Ant Neck field with Split Beam Vs Gradient Matching</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-302182/whole-neck-imrt-vs-low-ant-neck-field-with-split-beam-vs-gra</link>
				<description>3 alternate approaches to head and neck IMRT for primary tumor located above the level of larynx: highly debated issue</description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Ayan Basu</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>417597</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Excellent article discussing the pros &amp; cons of 3 alternate head and neck IMRT techniques for supra-laryngeal primary tumors:</p> <p>1.Whole neck IMRT<br /> 2.Upper head and neck IMRT with split beam matched low anterior neck fields<br /> 3.Upper head and neck IMRT with gradient matched low anterior neck fields</p> <p>Link: <a href="http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/1879-8500/PIIS1879850010000056.pdf">http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/1879-8500/PIIS1879850010000056.pdf</a></p> <p>Members' comments : would love to know which technique is preferred at different centers-i guess most centers have used all of the above and have decided to prefer one over the other - any particular reasons from your experience ?</p> <p>I feel the final sentence sums up the practice @ Univ Florida : they use whole neck IMRT for patients with high risk of disease in the posterior portion of lower neck and matched ( split-beam or gradient matched ) low anterior neck fields with upper head and neck IMRT for patients with low risk of disease in the posterior portion of lower neck, since a standard prescription of 2Gy @ 3cm depth as they have followed would under-dose the posterior region of the lower neck.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-298413</guid>
				<title>H &amp; N -- PET CT based target delineation</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-298413/h-n-pet-ct-based-target-delineation</link>
				<description>any standard guidelines for Target Volume delineation using PET !!!</description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>abhinavahluwalia</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>435805</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>1)Can GTV delineation be on the basis of PET CT.<br /> 2) Any standard guidelines for Target volume delineation for PET CT based contouring?<br /> 3) In case of NPC if neo adjuvant chemotherapy is given - the volume delineation for 70Gy can be based on post chemotherapy PET or it has to be pre chemo PET volume only?<br /> 4) PET CT avid nodes to be as GTV nodal volume for 70&#160;Gy and rest as high risk volume or the whole level needs to be included as 70&#160;Gy volume?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-296040</guid>
				<title>Submandibular Salivary Gland Transfer</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-296040/submandibular-salivary-gland-transfer</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Santam Chakraborty </wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>416676</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><iframe src="http://show.zoho.com/embed?id=20079000000011003&hide_toolbar=true&showrel=false" height="600" width="600" name="SMSGT-odp" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:1px solid #aabbcc"></iframe></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-288186</guid>
				<title>MRI in Head Neck Cancers.</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-288186/mri-in-head-neck-cancers</link>
				<description>Role of MR-Spectroscopy in Head Neck Squamous cell cancers</description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 02:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Nikhilesh Patil</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>416151</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Is there a role of MRI in Head Neck Cancers ? Which patients apart from Nasopharynx do you think MRI is helpful ?<br /> Can pretreatment MR-spectroscopy and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI help in knowing Tumor Metabolism and Perfusion in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ?<br /> Wanted to know how many of you actually think this will work and are looking at using these imaging tools.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-284718</guid>
				<title>Head Neck experts</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-284718/head-neck-experts</link>
				<description>What moleculars markers does head neck oncologists consider are important.</description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 01:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Nikhilesh Patil</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>416151</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Any comments about what molecular markers have made a difference in Head Neck cancers and how to use them in routine clinical practice?<br /> Eg., p16 in Oropharyngeal Cancers ? p53 status or any other markers?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-275577</guid>
				<title>Is 95% to 95%  the Benchmark ?</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-275577/is-95-to-95-the-benchmark</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>drbalunair</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>436106</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Dear friends,</p> <p>I've always been perplexed when the physicist tells me that &quot;its a nice plan as the 95% of PTV recieves 95% Dose&quot; and he will have a beautiful DVH to support that. In the context of IMRT in head and neck cancer do you think this would hold good always. I have found references where IMRT plans are accepted with this criteria and a paper calls it &quot;//The Minimum Benchmark for Plan acceptance&quot;. I would like to know the practice and may be discuss how much would we give and take in terms of coverage and hot spots.<br /> Also if somebody could put some pieces of info on how we would apply the heterogeneity range set by ICRU in the context of a Head and neck SIB IMRT</p> <p>Awaiting some enlightening pieces of information</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p>Dr Balukrishna S MD DNB DMRT<br /> Assistant Professor<br /> Radiation Oncology 1<br /> CMC , Vellore</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-263546</guid>
				<title>Hypoxic Cell Sensitizers and H&amp;N Radiotherapy</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-263546/hypoxic-cell-sensitizers-and-h-n-radiotherapy</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>radtuxabhishek</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>495857</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>For all the benefits of using hypoxic cell sensitizers, I do fail to understand why it is not being followed except in Denmark! Theoretically it is sound, technically feasible and we have a strong evidence in form a Phase III trial (DAHANCA 6&amp; 7).</p> <p>Seminars in Radiation Oncology has a lovely issue on Hypoxia (<a href="http://www.semradonc.com/issues/contents?issue_key=S1053-4296(00)X0016-1">http://www.semradonc.com/issues/contents?issue_key=S1053-4296(00)X0016-1</a>).</p> <p>What is the opinion of the house- for or against?</p> <p>Has anyone practised it? Where have you sourced Nimorazole (or any other drug) from?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-259642</guid>
				<title>Treatment Break</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-259642/treatment-break</link>
				<description>A patient is being treated with a radical course of RT for h &amp; n ca, conventional fractionation of 200 cGy per fraction, once a day for 35 fractions. After 4 wks. of treatment, he must miss the subsequent 2 weeks because of an out-of-town family crisis. Once treatment is restarted, what dose is needed to make up for the time he missed? (posted by ADJUVANT)</description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>AAM</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>61952</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The options are:</p> <ul> <li>leave the 2 week break to stand and suffer a 10-14% reduction in local control outcome (-0.6-1.0&#160;Gy/[day of prolongation])</li> <li>compensate for the break: <ul> <li>accelerate after the break <ul> <li>40Gy/20Fx @ 1/day = 4 weeks (conventional fractionation)</li> <li>10/7 break = 2 weeks</li> <li>30Gy/15Fx @ 2/day = 1 week + 2.5 day ('conventional' acceleration) with 6 hour delay. Maybe even weekend treatment?</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>Effect of 2-3 day prolongation will be small. His acute effects will be small as his mucosa will be undergoing ACCELERATED REPOPULATION.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-257918</guid>
				<title>H and N Ca</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-257918/h-and-n-ca</link>
				<description>Also on http://radonc.wikidot.com/forum</description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>adjuvant</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>534532</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I am aware of risk of LN+ (from M.D. Anderson) data in Head and Neck Ca. That's according to each site.</p> <p>Any data mentions the risk of LN involvement according to T stage in each site?</p> <p>For example: What's the risk of LN+ in T1 Glottic Ca? We all know : Less than 2%</p> <p>What about the other subsites?</p> <p>Also According to nodal stage… Can we get the estimate of distant metastasis? I have it for NPC:</p> <p>N0 : 0<br /> N1: 2%<br /> N2:5%<br /> N3:14%</p> <p>En total: 3%</p> <p>Thanks</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-251033</guid>
				<title>How important is RT QA</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-251033/how-important-is-rt-qa</link>
				<description>A look at a recent review article in Lancet Oncology</description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Santam Chakraborty </wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>416676</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I will like to draw the attention to a recent review article by June Corry from Peter MacCallum highlighting some of the ways in which therapeutic ratio H&amp;N cancer can be optimized further. One most intriguing hypothesis raised in the review based on the results of TROG 02.02 trial evaluating chemoradiation against chemoradiation + tirapazamine. There was almost a 20% improvement in <strong>Overall Survival</strong> with use of RT that adhered to the protocol. The author has raised an interesting point the Chemorad in some trials may be compensating for poor RT quality.<br /> What are your thoughts on this issue? I for one know that poor RT results in a significantly poorer control having experienced it first hand as a part of my dissertation work.<br /> A derivative issue is how is aggressive chemorad making these compliance issues worse?<br /> I will like the opinion of the house in this regard and what are your views and methods to ensure good RT delivery to all / maximum patients that you follow (or will like to follow)?</p> <p>Article Link <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6W85-4YH9FHV-M&amp;_user=1858992&amp;_coverDate=03%2F31%2F2010&amp;_fmt=full&amp;_orig=search&amp;_cdi=6645&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000052736&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=1858992&amp;md5=5139b3999740e1872bba168c6f54383e&amp;ref=full">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6W85-4YH9FHV-M&amp;_user=1858992&amp;_coverDate=03%2F31%2F2010&amp;_fmt=full&amp;_orig=search&amp;_cdi=6645&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000052736&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=1858992&amp;md5=5139b3999740e1872bba168c6f54383e&amp;ref=full</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-247421</guid>
				<title>Ca tongue pTxpN2b with polycystic kidney disease bilaterally with renal calculi</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-247421/ca-tongue-ptxpn2b-with-polycystic-kidney-disease-bilaterally</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Dr Nilesh Mahale</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>436619</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>42/F<br /> Left Lateral Border tongue lesion<br /> Biopsy: Squamus cell Ca<br /> Dec 09 Lt Hemiglossectomy done<br /> HPR: MDSCC pT not reported but depth 3&#160;mm. All cut margins and base free<br /> Neck observed as USG neck was normal<br /> No adjuvant treatment<br /> Lt nodal recurrence<br /> Lt Modified neck dissection<br /> HPR 2 LN at level III involved with Perinodal extension and 1 at level I involved<br /> Patient also has polycystic kidney disease bilaterally with renal calculi ( s Creat Normal) hence concurrent cisplatin/ carboplatin deemed not suitable by med onco<br /> Would like to discuss if there is any role for altered fractionation (On lines of OCAT trial at Tata Memorial )</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-246725</guid>
				<title>Muco epidermoid Ca of minor salivary gland in BM</title>
				<link>http://isocentre.wikidot.com/forum/t-246725/muco-epidermoid-ca-of-minor-salivary-gland-in-bm</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 07:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Dr Nilesh Mahale</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>436619</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>20/M<br /> Lt BM ulcer<br /> FNAC malignant cells ( mucoepidermoid ca/ adenoca/ adenoid cystic ca)<br /> CT scan: lt BM mass. no significant LN enlargement<br /> Lt BM w/e done<br /> HPR: 2.2*1.7 muco epidermoid Ca of minor salivary gland, no LVI/PNI. C/M free<br /> Post op 1 month developed Lt Ib LN<br /> FNAC metastatic epidermoid ca<br /> Lt MND HPR: 2/30 LN at 1b involved by metastatic muco epidermoid ca with minimal PNE</p> <p>Should I offer concurrent chemo in addition to RT</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>